Architectural rendering service becomes a game-maker in the real estate industry as it exceeded $2 billion mark in 2019 and has anticipated to grow over 20% in between 2020-2026. It remains no surprise that people tend to cling to the sophisticating presentation rather than showing a static and dull blueprint to potential clients.

I have worked with multiple individuals and entities who want to show building and interior design with photorealistic images in my entire career. Whether it is real estate developers who construct a residential park with 300 apartments or architects who present a tender or interior design, they all want to engage and visualizing presentation to win clients.

However, I would not recommend the architectural rendering services who don’t want the following considerations.

No Hassle to Enhance Project Marketing

Talking about project marketing; architectural rendering services can stand out your project, among others. It can boost your advertising for the long run and appealing clients to your project. However, I would not recommend rendering services if you tend not to bring your project on the winning edge. You can put boring 2D blueprints instead of photorealistic images in a residential or commercial that shows no standards. No one bothers to look at the poor blueprint; it’s like looking at a dull image that never engages with zero marketing.

No Intention to Attract Clients

The human brain attracts certain shapes more than others do as a study shows that human is fond of curves. Photorealistic images attract a great number of clients as the image shows real-time curvy appearance; it also shows the realistic and futuristic picture of your project. However, if you have no intention to attract the client toward the uniqueness of your project, you can skip architectural rendering services. You can rely on flat 2D images that show no depth and dimensional designs without guaranteeing clients’ attraction.

No Need to Get Precise Presentation

3D rendering service shows you the exact presentation you want to do to your project in the future. It gives a real-time scenario of how your project would look like in the future. It doesn’t require you to wait until you see it on the ground because photorealistic gives you the shot on the spot. Nevertheless, suppose you don’t need the precise presentation and can wait to see how your project would look like in-ground. In that case, I recommend continuing to rely on 2D images if you don’t want to get a precise presentation.

No Care to Detect Problems in your Project

Using traditional 2D flat images, they almost impossible to pinpoint problems in your project before construction occurs. If you don’t bother to identify structural integrity and flaws in your project, you can continue to rely on the flat images.

On the other hand, the 3D rendering can spot issues related to structure and design even before construction begins. You can still change and design that is unappealing to the testing audience. You can detect the problem early and avoid the embracement in your client’s eye in the future.

No Hurry to Edit Changes

Creating an exact presentation is a hectic job. Editing changes ask by your clients is always a daunting task. If you use flat images, they need a lot of time, effort, and resources to put your project re-sketching to make it look appealing. If you don’t want to edit your project faster when clients ask changes, I would certainly recommend you continuing with the non-photorealistic approach.

Whereas architectural rendering service is super-fast, especially when modifying changes asked by your client in a hurry. It doesn’t need more than just a click on fly tools such as AutoCAD to correct changes. About thousands of times can make changes, and see quick results. If you don’t like the new changes, you can revert the original structure and design with few clicks.

For more inquiry, and the state of the art 3D architectural rendering services, take a forward step, contact us, and take your project to the next level.